Skip to main content
Glama
SDias14

MCP Chat

by SDias14
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Chat

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Chat

      MeeraMendhe
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A command-line interface application enabling interactive chat with AI models via the Anthropic API. It supports document retrieval, command-based prompts, and extensible tool integrations through the MCP architecture.
      2
      -

    • MCP Chat

      dspenard
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP Chat is a CLI application that enables interactive chat with AI models via the Anthropic API, supporting document retrieval, command-based prompts, and extensible MCP tool integrations.
      2
      -

    • MCP Chat

      adijad
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A command-line interface application that enables interactive chat with AI models through the Anthropic API, supporting document retrieval, command-based prompts, and extensible MCP tool integrations.
      -

    • MCP Chat

      marbo786
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A command-line interface application for interactive chat with AI models via the Anthropic API. It supports document retrieval, command-based prompts, and extensible tool integrations through the MCP architecture.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: one reads document contents, the other edits by replacing a string. No ambiguity exists between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both use a verb_noun pattern (read_doc_contents, edit_document), but the noun part is slightly inconsistent ('doc_contents' vs 'document'). Minor deviation from perfect consistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a document-focused interface. It is borderline on the lower end of acceptable, as a minimal read/edit pair can work but lacks breadth.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface is severely limited—no create, delete, list, or search capabilities. For a document management domain, this leaves major gaps that would require agents to use other tools or fail.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources