Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
UAAR University MCP Server

UAAR University MCP Server

by SARAMALI15792
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

get_important_links

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve essential university website links for academic resources, admissions, and student services at PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi.

Instructions

Get important university website links.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_important_links"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.1

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations cover key traits (read-only, non-destructive, idempotent, closed-world), but the description adds value by specifying 'important' links, implying a curated subset rather than all links. It doesn't contradict annotations, and the added context is useful for understanding scope.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste—it directly states the tool's purpose without fluff. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with good annotations and no parameters, the description is adequate but lacks output details (no schema) and doesn't clarify scope relative to siblings. It's minimally viable, with clear gaps in usage context and return value explanation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0 parameters and 100% schema coverage, the baseline is 4 as no parameter documentation is needed. The description doesn't add param details, but that's acceptable given the empty schema, so it meets expectations without gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'important university website links', making the purpose specific and understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from siblings like 'get_university_info' or 'get_department_contact' that might also provide links, leaving some ambiguity about uniqueness.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools that might overlap (e.g., 'get_university_info'), the description lacks explicit context, prerequisites, or exclusions, offering minimal help for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools