Scholar Library
Related Servers
Alternatives to Scholar Library
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to interact with a local-first research knowledge workbench, supporting literature search, evidence-grounded Q&A, and reference export.2AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to build and query a project-local literature database by ingesting papers from Semantic Scholar, PubMed, arXiv, and OpenAlex, caching open-access PDFs, extracting full text, ranking results, and exposing MCP tools for search, seeds, feedback, and pipeline status over stdio.16-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables a local academic research workflow via any MCP client: literature search across Scopus and OpenAlex, citation chains, per-project research memory, paper download, and PDF-to-Markdown conversion through MinerU.GPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables provenance-first scholarly retrieval, paper ingestion, and reproducible research workflows by searching academic and developer sources, extracting source-located facts and claims, and preserving evidence and provider uncertainty for MCP clients.371Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that analyzes research papers, maps citation graphs, and surfaces insights with verbatim-verified contradictions, all while keeping data private on your machine.1MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceExposes a local biomedical literature pipeline as MCP tools for automated research workflows. Enables literature search, open-access paper retrieval, and draft generation for biomedical and pathology domains through standard MCP clients.6-
TDQS
Scored across 38 tools
Tools are mostly well separated by resource and action (e.g., search_literature vs search_library, parse_local_pdf vs parse_document). Some adjacent read/extract/parse-job tools (read_extraction vs read_parse_result, get_parse_job vs retry_parse vs resume_parse_observation) require careful reading, but descriptions clarify boundaries.
All names use snake_case and nearly all follow a verb_noun or action_object pattern. workspace_status is a minor noun-only exception, but the overall naming convention is predictable and readable.
38 tools is above the typical 3-15 band and exceeds the 25+ heavy threshold. The parsing, extraction, and job-management pipeline contains many granular tools that could be consolidated for easier agent selection.
The surface covers project setup, import, parsing, search, evidence building, export, deletion, backup/restore, and more. Minor lifecycle gaps exist (e.g., no explicit project-level delete/list beyond workspace_status), but major research workflows are well covered.