saihm-mcp-server (standards client)
Related Servers
Alternatives to saihm-mcp-server (standards client)
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides encrypted, portable memory for AI agents via MCP, allowing fact storage, conversation recall, and cross-machine sync using Arweave.10 npm50MIT

synapse-layerofficial
AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP-native persistent memory for AI agents. Stores and retrieves encrypted memories with Trust Quotient scoring, cross-agent handover protocol, and immutable audit trail. 13 tools. Remote endpoint available.1313Apache 2.0- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first, governable long-term memory for AI agents. Provides SQLite-backed storage, cross-session recall, and traceable memory corrections through a standard MCP interface.401MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA permissioned memory tree for you and your AI — served over MCP.9 npm1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityFmaintenancePersistent encrypted memory for AI agents. E2E encrypted private vaults, shared knowledge commons, topic channels, and agent-to-agent DMs. 23 MCP tools, free, no API key needed.24-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEmbedded memory and retrieval engine for AI agents, providing local-first memory with MCP support for multi-agent access control.32MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: memory lifecycle (remember/forget/recall), session status, sharing contracts (share/revoke_share), and governance (propose/vote). There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between tools.
All tools share the consistent 'saihm_' prefix, which signals the same domain. Minor deviations exist: some are bare verbs (saihm_remember, saihm_status) and governance tools use noun-verb ordering (saihm_governance_propose) rather than the verb-noun pattern seen in saihm_revoke_share.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a memory, sharing, and governance client. Each tool covers a distinct capability without redundancy or bloat.
Core memory operations (store, retrieve, delete), sharing lifecycle, and governance voting are covered. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to list open sharing contracts or enumerate governance proposals, but these are workable from the provided surface.