Skip to main content
Glama
S-FM

FAIM MCP Server

by S-FM
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to FAIM MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ftrack MCP Server

      VFX-Tools-LLC
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants with full access to the ftrack production tracking API, enabling natural language interactions to query projects, manage tasks, update statuses, and more.
      59
      2
      -

    • MCP Server Demo

      Drakoxw
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server implementation that can be run directly or through Docker, enabling AI assistants to interact with external systems through the MCP standard.
      2
      -

    • Semantic BI MCP

      LovroBubanic
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that gives AI assistants a safe, correct data-analyst capability over business metrics - without raw SQL improvisation.
      -

    • Prometheus MCP Server

      yanmxa
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to query Prometheus metrics, discover available data, and analyze system performance through natural language interactions.
      5
      48 npm
      MIT

    • Prophet MCP Server

      ipradeep99
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server powered by Meta's Prophet that enables LLMs to perform time-series forecasting, trend analysis, and predictive modeling on historical data. It provides LLM-friendly statistical summaries, automated business-rule validation, and ready-to-render Chart.js visualizations.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools serve entirely different purposes: one performs forecasting while the other lists available models. There is no ambiguity or overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the descriptive verb_noun pattern (forecast, list_models) and use consistent lowercase_with_underscores naming.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels underdeveloped for a forecasting platform. Expected tools like data management, evaluation, or model configuration are missing.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete. Typical forecasting workflows require data upload, model training, evaluation, and result retrieval, none of which are present beyond the basic forecast and model listing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources