Skip to main content
Glama
Ryu07-d

knowledge-curator-mcp

by Ryu07-d

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
WIKI_LANGNoWikipedia language edition (en, ja, ...)ja
OLLAMA_HOSTNoOllama server URLhttp://localhost:11434
OLLAMA_MODELNoAny installed Ollama modelqwen2.5:3b

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
fact_check_documentA

Fact-check a Markdown/Obsidian note using a local LLM (Ollama) and free sources (Wikipedia, DuckDuckGo). Identifies claims that are verified, contradicted, or need a citation.

verify_claimA

Verify a single claim with a local LLM against free sources, returning a verdict and citations.

add_citationsB

Fact-check a file and automatically insert citations for claims that need them.

scan_vault_for_issuesB

Scan an entire Obsidian vault and report files containing claims that are contradicted or need citations.

git_commit_correctionsC

Commit corrected files to git.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Tools are mostly distinct but add_citations and fact_check_document both operate on files and could be confused; one inserts citations while the other reports. scan_vault_for_issues is a batch version of fact_check_document, adding slight overlap.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most tools follow verb_noun (add_citations, fact_check_document, verify_claim) but git_commit_corrections and scan_vault_for_issues break the pattern with prepositional phrases or compound nouns, creating mild inconsistency.

Tool Count5/5

With 5 tools, the set is well-scoped for a knowledge curator. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy, and the count feels neither sparse nor overwhelming.

Completeness4/5

The tools cover the essential workflow: verify claims, fact-check documents, add citations, scan vaults, and commit. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for reverting changes or editing citations manually), but core operations are present.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues