codex-subagent-for-claude
Related Servers
Alternatives to codex-subagent-for-claude
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code or any MCP client to delegate hands-on coding work to OpenAI Codex over a persistent app-server process, keeping long-lived threads with follow-ups, async polling, approvals, steering, and interrupts. Supports native code review, resuming existing sessions, structured output, and parallel worktree-isolated tasks.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Codex to delegate tasks to interactive Claude Code sessions as role-controlled subagents for exploration, code review, and implementation, using the existing Claude Code installation on macOS.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to delegate tasks to OpenAI's Codex CLI (GPT-5.4) with structured execution traces, parallel execution, session persistence, and adversarial code review.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to hand off implementation tasks to OpenAI Codex models running through the Codex CLI, with tools for listing models, delegating work synchronously or in the background, collecting results, and continuing past sessions, while Claude stays the orchestrator that reviews diffs and runs tests.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Codex to offload expensive code reading, editing, and checking to a worker agent via Claude Code, supporting async jobs and long-running tasks.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables delegating bounded tasks from Codex to Claude Code, including read-only reviews, isolated branch edits, long-running background work, and approval handling.220 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct lifecycle action (spawn, status, wait, steer, interrupt, review), and descriptions actively disambiguate near-neighbors by naming the alternative ('只想看一眼不想等,用 codex_status'). The main residual overlap is codex_status vs codex_wait, since both return task results, though the blocking-immediate distinction is explained.
All six tools follow a uniform codex_<action> snake_case pattern (spawn, wait, status, steer, interrupt, review). Verbs are consistent and predictable throughout.
Six tools is well-scoped for a subagent-management server, covering spawn, monitoring, control, and review. Every tool earns its place with no redundant additions.
The surface covers the full task lifecycle: dispatch (spawn), monitor (status/wait), control (steer/interrupt), and review, plus thread continuation via thread_id. Minor gap: no explicit tool to enumerate historical/prior threads beyond session-scoped status.