Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-vision-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides vision understanding to non-multimodal agents via 4 tools (analyze/describe/OCR image, list providers), supporting 13 vision providers with automatic fallback and secure URL handling.
      4
      281 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A multi-model vision MCP server that gives image understanding to AI coding models lacking native vision, letting them analyze screenshots, error images, UIs, documents, and OCR content through a single unified tool. It supports several mainstream vision LLM providers plus any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, with automatic image cropping, compression, and retry handling.
      866 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for analyzing images using multiple vision LLM providers (OpenCode, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and custom OpenAI-compatible endpoints). Provides tools to analyze single or multiple images, list providers, and test vision capabilities.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a unified image-understanding tool for AI assistants without native vision, letting them analyze screenshots, error messages, UI layouts, and documents via multiple vision LLM providers. It supports local files, remote URLs, Data URIs, OCR, multi-crop processing, and standard MCP clients.
      866 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have entirely distinct purposes: analyze_image for image understanding and list_providers for listing provider presets. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (analyze_image, list_providers), making naming predictable and clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    Only two tools for a vision server feels slightly thin. While the count is not extreme, it borders on insufficient for typical vision tasks.

    Completeness2/5

    The server covers only basic image analysis and a provider listing, missing common vision operations like generation, manipulation, or filtering. The tool surface is significantly incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues