Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Memory Shell Detector MCP

Memory Shell Detector MCP

by RuoJi6
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

get_system_info_tool

Retrieves operating system type, platform architecture, and temporary directory to assess compatibility and determine tool paths for Java memory shell detection.

Instructions

获取当前系统环境信息

返回操作系统类型、平台架构、临时目录等信息， 用于判断检测工具的兼容性和确定工具存放路径。

Returns: system: 操作系统（Linux/Windows/Darwin） platform: 完整平台信息 machine: CPU 架构 temp_dir: 系统临时目录路径

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_system_info_tool"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description omits behavioral traits like read-only nature. However, lists return fields, which partially compensates.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded bilingual description, concise bullet list of return fields, no superfluous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With output schema present, description fully explains return values and purpose; no gaps for a parameterless tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters, baseline 4. Description adds meaning by detailing return fields beyond empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb+resource ('获取当前系统环境信息'), clearly distinguishes from siblings like check_network or download_detector_tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States use case: compatibility checking and tool storage path determination. Provides clear context but no explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools