teacher-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to teacher-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for student management with CRUD operations, supporting user authentication and student record management.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to interact with the Moodle platform to manage courses, students, assignments, and quizzes.710 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server for the Qingma Yizhan (青马易战) platform that provides automated quiz-answering capabilities. It enables users to retrieve course lists, fetch question details, and submit answers through a unified model context interface.32MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to interact with Moodle platforms to manage courses, students, assignments, and quizzes through natural language commands.710 npm43MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the QLDT HANU student management system, enabling AI assistants to authenticate and interact with the Hanoi University portal.1GPL 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server integrating ClassIn API to let AI assistants manage users, courses, classes, cloud storage, live streaming, and LMS with 48 tools.487 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 71 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes with detailed descriptions, but the sheer number (71) and subtle overlaps (e.g., login vs login_as, compose_paper vs create_paper) may cause occasional confusion. Overall clear, but not completely unambiguous.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_kg_tree, search_questions, upload_image). Naming conventions are uniform across the entire set, making it predictable for both agents and developers.
With 71 tools, the surface is highly excessive. While the domain is broad, this many tools overwhelm the agent and violate the ideal scope of 3-15. Scores of 50+ are extreme mismatches per the rubric.
The tool set covers most major workflows (CRUD for questions, books, plans, feedback, variants), but lacks a dedicated update_question tool, which is a notable gap. Otherwise, lifecycle coverage is reasonably thorough.