Skip to main content
Glama
RudrenduPaul

agent-observability

by RudrenduPaul
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-observability

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • otel-mcp

      moondef
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents access to your application's OpenTelemetry traces for querying, analysis, and debugging.
      5
      10 npm
      2
      MIT

    • @agent-audit/mcp-server

      xueca
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides structured audit logging for AI agent repair tasks via tools to start, record, end, query, and export event traces, with JSONL persistence and SDK integration.
      5
      2 npm
      MIT

    • AIS Revizor

      bswvladimir-beep
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that gives AI coding agents runtime visibility and AI-managed debug logging. It replaces blind print() debugging by turning runtime execution into causal chains, allowing agents to instantly locate bugs by finding missing .success events in Python and TypeScript code. Single binary with MCP, CLI, and HTTP interfaces.
      -

    • AgentTrace

      yashsrivastava16
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for tracing, logging, and debugging multi-agent systems by capturing sessions, spans, and events in a queryable trace tree.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool exposed, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool at the MCP level. All subcommands are contained within the single 'run' interface, so no ambiguity exists between distinct tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The tool name 'run' is a generic verb without a noun, so it does not follow a consistent verb_noun pattern. Since there is only one tool, there is no inconsistency, but the name is vague and provides little semantic guidance.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool for an entire agent-observability domain is far too thin, forcing all operations through one generic CLI wrapper. This makes the server feel more like a shell escape than a purpose-built MCP service; more granular tools for listing, replaying, and inspecting traces would be appropriate.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool can invoke any CLI subcommand, so the underlying functionality may be accessible, but the MCP surface itself is a single generic entry point. Agents cannot discover available operations without reading help output, which is a notable usability gap, though the CLI wrapper does allow core workflows to execute.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources