Skip to main content
Glama
RudrenduPaul

agent-observability

by RudrenduPaul
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-observability

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • otel-mcp

      moondef
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents access to your application's OpenTelemetry traces for querying, analysis, and debugging.
      5
      7 npm
      2
      MIT

    • @agent-audit/mcp-server

      xueca
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides structured audit logging for AI agent repair tasks via tools to start, record, end, query, and export event traces, with JSONL persistence and SDK integration.
      5
      4 npm
      MIT

    • AIS Revizor

      bswvladimir-beep
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that gives AI coding agents runtime visibility and AI-managed debug logging. It replaces blind print() debugging by turning runtime execution into causal chains, allowing agents to instantly locate bugs by finding missing .success events in Python and TypeScript code. Single binary with MCP, CLI, and HTTP interfaces.
      -

    • AgentTrace

      yashsrivastava16
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for tracing, logging, and debugging multi-agent systems by capturing sessions, spans, and events in a queryable trace tree.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of overlap or confusion between tools. The single 'run' tool clearly delegates to CLI subcommands, making its purpose unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    With only one tool, naming consistency is trivially maintained. The name 'run' is a simple verb that matches its role as an executor, though it lacks a noun prefix that might better indicate the subject.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool for wrapping an entire CLI is borderline. It feels thin for a server that could expose multiple distinct operations, but it is also a pragmatic design if the CLI is the core interface. The count is acceptable but not expansive.

    Completeness4/5

    The single 'run' tool provides access to all JSON-supporting subcommands (list, replay, inspect, diff, run), covering the main workflows of the agent-observability domain. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated help or non-JSON commands, but these are not critical for typical usage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources