WorkloadTruth MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to WorkloadTruth MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceeBPF-based GPU causal observability agent with MCP server. Traces CUDA Runtime and Driver APIs via kernel uprobes and host events via tracepoints to build causal chains explaining GPU latency. 7 tools: get_check, get_trace_stats, get_causal_chains, get_stacks, run_demo, get_test_report, run_sql. Telegraphic compression reduces token usage ~60%. Supports stdio and HTTPS (TLS 1.3) transport.1184-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables GPU profiling and performance analysis via NVIDIA Nsight Systems, allowing agents to profile binaries and aggregate statistics for kernels, memory copies, and NVTX ranges. It supports advanced analysis through interval tree construction and structural queries on profiling reports.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to profile and disassemble GPU kernels, benchmark and compare candidate rewrites against baselines, and run an autonomous speedrun loop that verifies and records results.1032 PyPIApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to capture and analyze bounded runtime evidence from application and native code, GPU kernels, and inference stacks through profilers, benchmarks, and trace processors. It records typed evidence, provenance, coverage, and limitations so agents can trace and burn down performance hotspots.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables coding agents to run bounded profiling, benchmarking, and trace analysis on application, native, GPU, and inference workloads, returning typed evidence, provenance, coverage, and recovery actions inline.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to discover NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel GPUs, monitor utilization, memory, temperature, power, clocks, and processes, retain bounded local history, and estimate whether AI models fit available VRAM before loading them.18MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: classify_workload performs live classification, run_benchmark tests the classifier on synthetic data, and verify_audit_log checks log integrity. There is no overlap or plausible confusion between tool purposes.
All three tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: classify_workload, run_benchmark, verify_audit_log. The naming is uniform and each verb clearly indicates the action.
Three tools is within the well-scoped 3-15 range, and each tool earns its place: one for core classification, one for benchmark/evaluation, and one for audit verification. No tool feels redundant or missing from the core set.
The primary workflow is fully covered: classifying a workload, evaluating classifier robustness, and verifying audit logs. A minor gap is the absence of a continuous monitoring/watch tool, but that does not block the server's stated purpose.