Skip to main content
Glama
Rudra-ravi

MCP TaskManager

by Rudra-ravi
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP TaskManager

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • AI Note MCP Server

      ainote-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that connects Claude Desktop to AI Note task management, enabling task creation, updates and management through natural language conversations.
      5
      30 npm
      1
      MIT

    • @kazuph/mcp-taskmanager

      kazuph
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol server for Task Management. This allows Claude Desktop (or any MCP client) to manage and execute tasks in a queue-based system.
      10
      864 npm
      216
      MIT

    • my-mcp-server

      15972289829
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that allows integration with Claude Desktop by creating and managing custom tools that can be executed through the MCP framework.
      30 npm
      -

    • MCP Memory Server

      ebailey78
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for Claude Desktop that provides structured memory management across chat sessions, allowing Claude to maintain context and build a knowledge base within project directories.
      19 npm
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: request_planning initiates workflows, add_tasks_to_request extends them, get_next_task fetches pending tasks, mark_task_done and approve_task_completion handle task completion steps, delete_task and update_task modify tasks, open_task_details inspects tasks, list_requests provides overviews, and approve_request_completion finalizes requests. The descriptions reinforce these boundaries, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores, such as add_tasks_to_request, approve_request_completion, and get_next_task. There are no deviations in style or convention, making the naming predictable and easy to parse for an agent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools, the set is well-scoped for a task management domain, covering the full lifecycle from planning to completion. Each tool serves a specific role in the workflow, and there are no extraneous or missing tools that would suggest over- or under-engineering.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides complete CRUD and lifecycle coverage for task management: request_planning (create), list_requests (read), update_task (update), delete_task (delete), along with workflow-specific tools like get_next_task, mark_task_done, approve_task_completion, and approve_request_completion. There are no obvious gaps, and the descriptions outline a coherent end-to-end process.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources