grocy-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to grocy-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables interaction with Grocy's API through MCP, allowing management of grocery inventory, shopping lists, and household tasks via natural language.119 npm29MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage household operations including groceries, inventory, chores, recipes, and shopping lists through the Grocy self-hosted ERP system.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients like ChatGPT and Claude to manage a household's shared food inventory, meal plans, recipes, and preferences through natural language, with atomic updates and audit logging.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Grocy that enables AI assistants to read and manage pantry stock, product catalogs, and shopping lists, with safety checks against common errors.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to browse, read, write, delete, and search Cooklang recipes through the CookCLI HTTP API as MCP tools.7MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceExposes a self-hosted Mealie instance to MCP clients, enabling management of recipes, meal plans, shopping lists, and organizers through natural language.21Eclipse Public 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 89 tools
Most tools have distinct scopes with clear descriptions and cross-references (e.g., stock_search vs stock_barcode_lookup). Some overlap exists between recipe_fulfillment and recipe_consume_preview, and between shopping_list_set_amount and shopping_list_update, but descriptions help disambiguate. Overall, an agent can generally tell tools apart despite the large set.
The dominant pattern is <domain>_<action>_tool, which is predictable and readable. However, singular/plural prefixes are inconsistent (chores_list vs chore_execute, batteries_list vs battery_details), and a few tools like discover_candidates_tool break the pattern. Still, the convention is mostly consistent.
89 tools is far above the typical well-scoped range and feels excessive. Many tools are near-duplicates (six print label tools, multiple shopping-list population tools, and generic entity CRUD alongside domain-specific CRUD). This could be consolidated with parameterized tools, making the surface heavy and harder to navigate.
Core workflows (stock, shopping list, recipes, chores, tasks, meal plans, batteries, equipment) are well covered. However, there are notable lifecycle gaps: recipe deletion, chore update, location update/delete, battery delete, equipment delete, and file listing are missing. Generic entity tools partially mask these gaps but require low-level knowledge, so agents may hit dead ends.