Skip to main content
Glama
Rubio-Enterprises

grocy-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to grocy-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Grocy's API through MCP, allowing management of grocery inventory, shopping lists, and household tasks via natural language.
      119 npm
      29
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage household operations including groceries, inventory, chores, recipes, and shopping lists through the Grocy self-hosted ERP system.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients like ChatGPT and Claude to manage a household's shared food inventory, meal plans, recipes, and preferences through natural language, with atomic updates and audit logging.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Grocy that enables AI assistants to read and manage pantry stock, product catalogs, and shopping lists, with safety checks against common errors.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 89 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct scopes with clear descriptions and cross-references (e.g., stock_search vs stock_barcode_lookup). Some overlap exists between recipe_fulfillment and recipe_consume_preview, and between shopping_list_set_amount and shopping_list_update, but descriptions help disambiguate. Overall, an agent can generally tell tools apart despite the large set.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant pattern is <domain>_<action>_tool, which is predictable and readable. However, singular/plural prefixes are inconsistent (chores_list vs chore_execute, batteries_list vs battery_details), and a few tools like discover_candidates_tool break the pattern. Still, the convention is mostly consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    89 tools is far above the typical well-scoped range and feels excessive. Many tools are near-duplicates (six print label tools, multiple shopping-list population tools, and generic entity CRUD alongside domain-specific CRUD). This could be consolidated with parameterized tools, making the surface heavy and harder to navigate.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows (stock, shopping list, recipes, chores, tasks, meal plans, batteries, equipment) are well covered. However, there are notable lifecycle gaps: recipe deletion, chore update, location update/delete, battery delete, equipment delete, and file listing are missing. Generic entity tools partially mask these gaps but require low-level knowledge, so agents may hit dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues