Skip to main content
Glama
RoxyAPI

RoxyAPI Astrology MCP server

Official

Monthly Aspects - Tropical aspect calendar for an entire month

post_astrology_aspects_monthly
Read-only

Retrieve every planetary aspect perfecting in a month across 13 non-lunar Western bodies, with exact times in your timezone. Use for monthly forecasts, transit calendars, and electional timing.

Instructions

Get every planetary aspect that perfects during a given month, across the 13 non-lunar Western bodies: the Sun and Mercury through Pluto, both lunar nodes, Chiron and Black Moon Lilith. Detects nine aspects, five major (conjunction, sextile, square, trine, opposition) and four minor (semi-sextile, semi-square, sesquiquadrate, quincunx), each with its own traditional orb, and returns the exact date and time of closest approach in your timezone along with the nature of the aspect. Calculated on tropical longitudes. The Moon is excluded because it forms hundreds of aspects a month and belongs in a daily view rather than a monthly one. Omit year and month to get the month in progress, so a published calendar stays current without a redeploy. Essential for monthly forecast copy, transit calendars, electional timing, and newsletter automation. Monthly aspect calendar API, exact aspect times, planetary aspect ephemeris, transit timing. Verified against NASA JPL Horizons.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
langNoResponse language (BCP 47). Supported: en, tr, de, es, hi, pt, fr, ru, zh-Hans, zh-Hant. Defaults to en. Coverage varies by domain, and a field with no translation in the requested language returns English.en
yearNoYear for the aspect calendar (1551 to 2649). Defaults to the current year (UTC).
monthNoMonth number (1-12). Defaults to the current month (UTC).
compactNoSet true for the same data in a compact shape: arrays of same-shaped objects arrive columnar as {"__cols":[names],"__rows":[[values]]}. Lossless, typically 40 to 52 percent fewer tokens.
nodeTypeNoLunar node convention. "mean" is the smoothed average node, which always moves retrograde; "true" is the osculating node, which tracks the real perturbed node, oscillates up to about 1.5 degrees either side of the mean on a 173-day cycle, and can briefly turn direct. Neither is more correct and they almost always fall in the same sign. Applies to the North and South Node. True is the osculating node and the default, because it is what most Western chart software reports; mean is the smoothed node preferred by several evolutionary schools, so pass "mean" to match one. Nothing else in the chart changes, and the two agree on the sign except when the node sits within about 1.8 degrees of a cusp. Defaults to "true".true
timezoneNoTimezone: an IANA name (e.g. "America/New_York", "Europe/London", or `cities[0].timezone` from /location/search) or decimal hours from UTC (e.g. -5 for EST, 5.5 for IST). An IANA name is resolved once, at the start of the window, and that offset applies to every time in the response. Event dates and times are reported in this zone, which is what makes a published calendar read correctly for its audience. Defaults to 0 (UTC).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
yearYes
monthYes
eventsYes
timezoneYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already confirm read-only and non-destructive behavior, so the bar is lower. The description adds valuable context: exact date/time in the chosen timezone, tropical longitudes, Node convention notes, default month behavior, and validation against NASA JPL Horizons. Missing only edge-case details like rate limits or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The core purpose is front-loaded and informative, but the final sentence ('Monthly aspect calendar API, exact aspect times, planetary aspect ephemeris, transit timing. Verified against NASA JPL Horizons.') is SEO-style keyword stuffing that does not help an agent. Mild redundancy elsewhere slightly bloats the definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich output schema and read-only annotations, the description covers what the tool returns, what is excluded and why, default behavior when year/month are omitted, and timezone handling. Nothing critical for correct invocation appears to be missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all six parameters in detail. The description reiterates timezone behavior and default month selection but adds no new parameter meaning beyond what the structured schema provides; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Get every planetary aspect that perfects') and resource ('monthly aspect calendar'), with scope ('13 non-lunar Western bodies'). It distinguishes itself from daily views by excluding the Moon, but does not name a sibling tool like post_astrology_aspects, leaving some differentiation to inference.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear use cases ('monthly forecast copy, transit calendars, electional timing, newsletter automation') and an exclusion ('The Moon is excluded ... belongs in a daily view'). However, it does not explicitly point to a specific alternative sibling tool, so the guidance stops short of full when/when-not/alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.