discord_clear_presence
Remove your Discord status and activity display to appear offline or reset your profile presence.
Instructions
Clear your Discord presence/activity
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Remove your Discord status and activity display to appear offline or reset your profile presence.
Clear your Discord presence/activity
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the action ('clear') but doesn't explain what 'clear' entails (e.g., removes status, sets to offline, requires user permissions), potential side effects, or response behavior. This leaves significant gaps for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste. It's front-loaded with the core action and resource, making it easy to parse quickly without unnecessary elaboration.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's mutation nature (clearing presence), lack of annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't cover behavioral aspects like what 'clear' means operationally, authentication needs, or expected outcomes, which are crucial for safe and effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has 0 parameters with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema fully documents the lack of inputs. The description doesn't need to add parameter details, and it correctly implies no inputs are required, aligning with the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Clear') and the resource ('your Discord presence/activity'), making the purpose immediately understandable. It doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'discord_update_presence', but the verb 'clear' versus 'update' provides implicit distinction.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives is provided. The description implies usage when clearing presence is needed, but it doesn't mention prerequisites, timing considerations, or how it relates to 'discord_update_presence' for setting a new presence.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RossH121/discord-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server