korean-notice-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to korean-notice-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI tools to search and read the internal regulations of 355 Korean public institutions by title or article text, compare them against the latest innovation guideline, and flag newer revisions. It also saves review results as Hangul (HWPX) revision documents with old-versus-new comparison tables, without requiring an API key.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read and edit Korean HWP/HWPX documents, including converting Hanyang PUA old-Hangul characters to Unicode jamo, diagnosing unsupported characters, and preserving arae-a, panch'im, yet-ieung, expanded jamo, filler and side dots. Also supports HWPX search-and-replace, template filling, paragraph/table/image/style editing, page rendering to SVG/HTML, and creating new HWPX documents.1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceRecognizes HWP/HWPX form structures and fills in AI-generated values while preserving original formatting, enabling natural language interaction with Korean word processor documents.626MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude and people to co-edit Korean HWP/HWPX documents on a self-hosted server without Hancom Office, where AI edits appear live in a browser while human changes flow back to the client. Originals stay untouched as every change accumulates into versioned revisions that can be diffed, previewed, and undone.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to search Korean local government project, plan, and budget documents through AI apps, compare cases across municipalities, and check planning, budget, and support conditions against original-source citations.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables secure local proofreading of Korean official documents (.hwpx/.hwp) using 3-layer AI correction for spelling, grammar, and official document style. Provides 50 administrative document templates for generating standardized official correspondence without cloud dependencies or API keys.24MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: reading a notice, extracting structured requirements, comparing notices across years, and retrieving evidence by hash/location. No two tools overlap in function, and the descriptions clearly differentiate them.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: read_notice, extract_requirements, compare_notices, get_evidence. This is predictable and easy to reason about.
With only 4 tools, the server is tightly scoped to the analysis of Korean notices. Each tool is necessary and non-redundant, and the count is appropriate for the domain without feeling sparse or bloated.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle of notice analysis: reading the raw document, extracting key requirements, comparing with previous years, and verifying evidence. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose, and the workflow is complete.