Skip to main content
Glama
Ronnie-Nutrition

EasyAiFlows Automation Assessment

by Ronnie-Nutrition
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to EasyAiFlows Automation Assessment

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • essetech-ai-readiness-mcp

      seppez89
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to assess a small business's AI readiness (0–100 score), suggest tailored AI use cases, describe Essetech's services, and book a free consultation.
      4
      7 npm
      MIT

    • hive-mcp-audit-readiness

      srotzin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Computes multi-jurisdictional AI compliance readiness scores with sourced penalty math, enabling gap analysis and audit tier recommendations.
      MIT

    • automation-audit

      zuperRuslana
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to evaluate business processes for automation by collecting discovery answers, calculating labor costs, scoring automation potential, and saving completed audits to a local SQLite database.
      8
      -

    • geo-audit

      nycsav
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Evaluates any website's AI visibility with 15 checks across crawlability, structure, content, and connectivity, and provides actionable fixes.
      1 npm
      MIT

    • ai-visibility-mcp

      rccola990-cloud
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check whether AI assistants recommend a brand and audit a site's AI-agent readiness, providing visibility scores and specific gaps.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one assesses automation readiness and provides recommendations, the other gives industry-specific examples. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (assess_* and get_*), making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a comprehensive automation assessment service. While it covers core tasks, the count is borderline low for its apparent scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is minimal, lacking capabilities to manage assessments over time, compare results, or handle follow-up actions. Significant gaps exist beyond one-shot queries.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources