Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to gti-1c-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for RAG-based search over 1C Enterprise configuration documentation, enabling natural language queries to find objects like справочники, документы, and отчеты.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for 1C:Enterprise ERP with 35 tools: metadata inspection, document CRUD, register queries, and BSP integration. First MCP server for Russian ERP systems (300,000+ organizations). JSON-RPC 2.0 compliant BSL implementation.
      51
      37
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for 1C:Enterprise that provides AI assistants with access to configuration data via vector search, structural indexing, and call graphs. It enables semantic code queries and rapid metadata object lookups without requiring the direct reading of raw files.
      77
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for searching and analyzing 1C enterprise metadata and BSL code using a SQLite backend. Enables querying configuration structure, code routines, and performing compliance checks via natural language.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for integrating AI assistants with Bitrix24, enabling retrieval and management of CRM entities, tasks, scrum, and knowledge bases through natural language.
      4 npm
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for 1C:Enterprise that provides precise syntax reference cards (call signatures, parameters, return types, examples) by element name and lists object members. It helps AI agents answer 1C development questions using the official Russian help book.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there is overlap between keyword and semantic search, and between suggest_access_profile and suggest_profile_by_job. Descriptions help an agent differentiate them, though occasional ambiguity remains.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming mixes verb_noun (list_instructions), verb_by_noun (search_by_role), and non-verb forms (onec_health). The inconsistency is readable but not predictable, making it harder to guess tool names.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is on the heavier side but justified by the server's three subdomains: instructions, RBAC profiles, and live 1C queries. Each tool has a specific role, though the count slightly exceeds the ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full read-only workflow: listing, searching, retrieving, explaining, validating, and checking health. Minor gaps exist such as no write/update capabilities, but for the apparent advisory purpose, coverage is solid.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing