MCP Feishu Project Manager
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Feishu Project Manager
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceImplements a Model Context Protocol server for intelligent end-to-end requirement management and development automation, integrating with Feishu project systems.10 npm5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI applications to interact with Jira issues, projects, and workflows through a standardized interface.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing AI assistants with comprehensive project, task, and subtask management capabilities with project-specific storage.2910 npm88MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing comprehensive task management capabilities with support for project organization, task tracking, and automatic PRD parsing into actionable items.37MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Azure DevOps work items, projects, wikis, and boards through natural language.41184 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects AI clients to the Agile Luminary project management system, allowing users to retrieve project details, work assignments, and product information within AI conversations.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes focused on different aspects of project management (roles, views, work items, metadata), but get_view_detail and get_view_detail_by_name have significant overlap as both retrieve work item lists from views using different identifiers. The descriptions clarify the difference (view_id vs view_name), but the core functionality is similar, which could cause some confusion.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with clear, descriptive names (get_flow_roles, get_view_detail, get_view_list, etc.). The naming convention is uniform throughout the set, making it easy to understand each tool's purpose at a glance.
With 6 tools, the count is reasonable for a project management server, covering key operations like retrieving roles, views, and work items. However, it feels slightly thin as it lacks update, create, or delete operations, which are common in such domains, limiting it to read-only functionality.
The tool set is severely incomplete for a project manager server, as it only provides read operations (get_*). There are no tools for creating, updating, or deleting work items, views, or roles, which are essential for managing a project lifecycle. This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform basic project management tasks.