Skip to main content
Glama
RohanOnKeys

Hammer MCP

by RohanOnKeys
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Hammer MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • CAD MCP Server

      Codemod3
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables reading, analyzing, and editing CAD files (DXF and DWG) via natural language, including entity queries, layer management, and safe copy-based edits.
      17
      1
      MIT

    • AutoCAD MCP

      bisingwaj
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI assistant to conversationally control Autodesk AutoCAD, drawing, inspecting, and editing plans, and includes a cross-platform DXF engine that runs without AutoCAD on macOS and Linux. It exposes tools for rendering views as images, batching geometry, blocks, and structures, measuring and checking plans, and undoing whole batches.
      12
      MIT

    • autocad-mcp

      agtmwebtoon
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs like Claude to create and edit AutoCAD drawings via natural language, supporting both headless DXF generation and live AutoCAD LT connection through file-based IPC.
      9
      MIT

    • Fusion 360 MCP

      jaskirat1616
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered parametric CAD design in Autodesk Fusion 360 through natural language commands. Supports multiple AI backends (Ollama, OpenAI, Gemini, Claude) with intelligent routing and safety validation for geometric operations.
      16
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All tools have clearly distinct purposes, separated by domain (DXF vs OpenSCAD) and operation type. No two tools appear to do the same thing; even similar-named tools like create_box and draw_rectangle target different axes (3D vs 2D).

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming conventions are mixed: some use 'draw_', some 'create_', some 'boolean_', and others have no consistent prefix (e.g., linear_extrude, export_model). While readable, the lack of a uniform pattern makes it harder for an agent to predict tool names.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools is slightly on the higher side but appropriate for a CAD server covering both 2D and 3D. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and the count is justified by the need to handle primitives, operations, rendering, and file I/O.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers basic shape creation, boolean operations, extrusion, rendering, and file saving. Minor gaps include lack of editing tools for existing objects (e.g., move, rotate) and more advanced DXF entities like splines, but core CAD workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources