MCP Smart Contract Analyst
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Smart Contract Analyst
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Monad Testnet blockchain, including reading block data, balances, transactions, and token operations via natural language.28 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables static security audit of Solidity smart contracts by analyzing source code or deployed bytecode for vulnerabilities, providing risk scores and detailed findings.1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceFetches verified EVM smart contract source code, scans for vulnerabilities, analyzes token holder distribution, and generates audit reports.5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Monad testnet to check balances, examine transaction details, get gas prices, and retrieve block information.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides tools for querying onchain data across 12+ blockchain networks, including token balances, transaction analysis, and smart contract security auditing. It enables users to interact with multiple EVM-compatible chains and perform deep contract evaluations through natural language interfaces.1-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables secure interaction with blockchain smart contracts across multiple chains, including ABI analysis, contract method invocation (view/nonpayable/payable), and local wallet management for Ethereum and Base networks.31-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one analyzes unverified contracts and the other analyzes verified contracts on the Monad testnet. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, as the verification status is a binary distinction that cleanly separates their use cases.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'analyze' as the verb and descriptive adjectives ('unverified', 'verified') modifying the noun 'contract'. The naming is perfectly uniform and predictable across the set.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a 'Smart Contract Analyst' domain. While the tools cover analysis of both verified and unverified contracts, the scope suggests potential for more analytical operations (e.g., security checks, gas estimation, function analysis), making the current count insufficient for comprehensive analysis.
The server is severely incomplete for smart contract analysis. It only provides basic analysis based on verification status, missing essential operations like vulnerability scanning, gas optimization suggestions, code complexity metrics, or interaction with contract functions. This limited surface will likely cause agent failures when deeper analysis is required.