NotebookLM MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to NotebookLM MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with Google NotebookLM through a unified CLI and MCP server, featuring automatic multi-browser authentication and support for notebook queries, source management, notes, and audio generation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA thin MCP wrapper around the unofficial Google NotebookLM Python client, enabling notebook management, source handling, chat, artifact generation, deep research, and sharing via MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying Google NotebookLM notebooks, enabling AI assistants to list notebooks, read sources, and ask questions about them.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn unofficial MCP server for Google NotebookLM that enables users to manage notebooks, add sources, ask questions with citations, and generate audio podcasts via a Playwright-based automation layer.19MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that lets CLI agents (Claude, Codex, Cursor) chat directly with Google NotebookLM for zero-hallucination answers based on user's own notebooks.2,451MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that provides ~39 tools to interact with Google NotebookLM's internal API, enabling notebook management, source addition, chat queries, and Studio artifact generation through stdio, HTTP, and SSE transports.39MIT
TDQS
Scored across 41 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation or resource. Even with many tools, the boundaries are clear: notebook CRUD, source management, research pipeline, studio artifacts, notes, sharing, tags, etc. No two tools perform the same function.
Tool names follow different patterns: some use noun_verb (notebook_create, source_add), others verb_noun (download_artifact, export_artifact), and some are single words (note, batch). While subdomains have internal consistency, the overall naming is mixed.
41 tools is a very large surface for a single server. Although it covers extensive NotebookLM functionality, the count is high enough to overwhelm agents. Several tools could be consolidated (e.g., async query start/status, podcast tools redundant with studio).
The toolset covers nearly all NotebookLM features: full CRUD for notebooks, sources, notes, artifacts, research, sharing, tags, configuration, authentication, and batch operations. No obvious gaps in functionality for the domain.