humanize_type

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Only mentions Gaussian-distributed delays but lacks details on other behaviors (e.g., keystroke order, special characters, abort behavior). With no annotations, the description fails to fully disclose behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very brief, which is efficient but omits necessary details. It is front-loaded with purpose but lacks completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (2 parameters), the description is too sparse. It fails to explain output, parameter role (mean_delay), and context relative to sibling tools like type_text.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and description does not explain parameters. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema's field names and types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool types text with Gaussian-distributed delays, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like type_text (likely unhumanized) and humanize_click.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use humanized typing versus alternatives like type_text. No mention of use cases, prerequisites, or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.