Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to spotify-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and browse music catalogs and libraries, manage playlists and favorites, control playback, and view or modify the Up Next queue across macOS, Windows, and Linux.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to manage Apple Music playlists, library, catalog, discovery, playback, and the Up Next queue across macOS, Windows, and Linux using native Music.app, the Apple Music API, Safari, or Chrome engines.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and manage playlists, library, catalog, discovery, playback, and the Up Next queue, picking per call among native Music.app, browser web-player, and web API engines on macOS, Windows, and Linux. Only a Mac or an Apple Music subscription is required.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to control Apple Music playlists, library, catalog, discovery, playback, and the Up Next queue across macOS, Windows, and Linux using native app, Apple Music API, Safari, or Chrome engines.
      -

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a clearly distinct resource or action, and the playback/library/playlist clusters are cleanly separated. The main overlap is playlist_rename versus playlist_set_details (both can change a playlist's name), and resolve versus search have related but distinguishable purposes.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming mixes conventions: single verbs (play, pause, skip), noun-first (saved_tracks, now_playing, top_tracks), verb_noun (save_albums, follow_artists), and noun_verb for the playlist_* family. The playlist_ prefix is internally consistent and everything stays readable, but there is no single predictable pattern across the server.

    Tool Count3/5

    36 tools is on the heavy side, but the domain (playback control, library, discovery, and full playlist CRUD) genuinely warrants many operations. It sits at the borderline where a few tools (e.g. separate rename and set_details) could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad and coherent: playback, library management, search/discovery, and playlist lifecycle all have create/read/update/delete paths with sensible destructive guards. Minor gaps remain, e.g. shuffle/repeat mode toggles and dedicated album/artist detail retrieval.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues