Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
RobackaB

Novelty Research MCP

by RobackaB
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Novelty Research MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • patent-mcp

      goveda
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered patent search and analysis across 220M+ global patents. Semantic search, prior art discovery, novelty/patentability reports, and patent content retrieval.
      Apache 2.0

    • LabScout

      actogram
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search public sources for labs, papers, grants, clinical trials, and patents on a research topic, returning ranked labs with explanations, researcher profiles, and geographic data.
      MIT

    • PriorArt Triage Agent

      hworku24
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables prior-art searches on granted US patent claims. Given an invention description, it returns a grounded memo with citations, verifying each finding against the source and quarantining unverifiable claims.
      1
      -

    • io.github.MohdSaleh/tinyfish

      MohdSaleh
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables latency-conscious, auditable deep research by delegating bounded semantic judgments to the calling client LLM while the server owns retrieval, durable state, evidence integrity, citation auditing, and deterministic quality gates.
      20
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase of the research pipeline: session creation, query decomposition, three evidence sources (patent/publication/web), readiness checking, and final report generation. The three evidence tools differ only by source type, which is an intentional and clear parallel structure rather than a source of confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow two clear patterns: research_session_* for lifecycle operations and {source}_evidence_to_session for evidence gathering, all in snake_case. Minor deviation: research_session_checklist and research_session_user_answer use nouns rather than verbs, breaking the otherwise consistent verb-first convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools map cleanly onto the novelty research workflow with no redundancy. Each tool earns its place in the pipeline, and the count is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a focused server.

    Completeness4/5

    The full research workflow is covered: start session, decompose query, gather evidence from three sources, check readiness, and produce the final report. Minor gaps exist—no way to delete/reset a session or remove incorrectly stored evidence—but these are edge cases rather than workflow-breaking omissions.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources