glm-vision-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to glm-vision-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides image analysis, OCR text extraction, and image description using the GLM-4V Flash model from Zhipu AI.38MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that leverages Zhipu's free GLM-4.6V-Flash vision model to enable image, video, and file understanding (OCR, table parsing, defect detection, document Q&A, and more) across MCP-compatible clients like Codex and Claude Desktop.-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that wraps the free GLM-4.6V-Flash vision model, enabling text-only LLM clients like Codex, Cursor, and Claude Desktop to analyze images, videos, and files (PDF/TXT) through standard MCP tools.32-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceThis MCP server gives pure-text LLM agents vision capabilities by integrating the free GLM-4.6V-Flash visual model, enabling image, video, and file understanding through standard MCP tools.31MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for analyzing images using multiple vision LLM providers (OpenCode, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and custom OpenAI-compatible endpoints). Provides tools to analyze single or multiple images, list providers, and test vision capabilities.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMulti-model vision understanding MCP server that provides unified image analysis for AI assistants without native vision, supporting models like GLM-4.6V, DeepSeek-OCR, Qwen3-VL-Flash, and more.1367 npm113MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are completely distinct: analyze_image handles all image analysis tasks while check_config verifies setup. There is zero overlap or ambiguity in their purposes.
Both tools follow the consistent verb_noun snake_case convention—analyze_image and check_config. The pattern is clean and predictable, matching the higher-scoring examples.
With only 2 tools in a server, the count falls into the 'feels thin' category. While the core vision analysis capability is covered by a single tool, the overall server feels minimal and could reasonably be expected to have a few more supporting tools to feel substantial.
The single analysis tool fully covers the core domain of image description, OCR, and chart parsing—no obvious dead ends for standard usage. The config check provides useful operational support. Minor gaps like batch processing or model inquiry are absent but not critical for the stated scope.