Reviewer Zero
Related Servers
Alternatives to Reviewer Zero
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceConnects Claude to OpenReview to facilitate conference reviewer and area chair workflows through the Model Context Protocol. It enables users to manage paper assignments, read submissions and reviews, and perform write actions like submitting reviews or comments using a preview-and-confirm system.13MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables auditing of every citation in a LaTeX or Markdown manuscript (English or Portuguese) against the actual passage in the cited PDF, verifying quotes literally, fetching sources from local folders, Zotero, arXiv and open-access APIs, and flagging bibliography problems such as retractions or missing DOIs. It also drafts and safely applies approved rewrites or new evidence-backed paragraphs in the .tex file with validation, encoding preservation and backups.19MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching for scientific papers across OpenAlex, CrossRef, and Unpaywall, and downloading open-access PDFs directly through Claude Desktop.51MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables reviewing and managing AI research paper candidates from arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and Hugging Face Daily Papers, scored against personal interests, via MCP tools in Claude Desktop or Cowork.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceSearch and read arXiv papers directly from Claude. Supports keyword, author, category, and date filtering plus full PDF text extraction so Claude can read, summarise, and reason over entire papers, not just abstracts.525MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for agentic-first PDF review of LaTeX papers, enabling commenting, compiling, and visual inspection via Claude Code.8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: searching prior work, single-paper lookup, citation-graph traversal, format checking, reference resolution, quote verification, and full review. The main overlap is that review_paper orchestrates the same steps the atomic tools perform individually, but the descriptions frame the atomic tools as composable primitives, so an agent can tell which to pick.
check_format, check_citations, verify_quotes, find_prior_work, and review_paper follow a clear verb_noun pattern. The bare nouns 'paper' and 'citations' are the only deviations, and they remain readable and unambiguous.
Seven tools is well-scoped for a paper-review assistant, with each tool earning its place: atomic checks, lookup, graph traversal, and one orchestrating full review. No redundant or filler tools.
The surface covers the core review lifecycle: prior-work search, paper lookup, citation following, format/anonymization checks, reference validation, quote verification, and a full pipeline. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no standalone claim-extraction or title/author search), but agents can work around them.