NotesY
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| process_note_requestD | – |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools, as there are no other tools to compare it to. The tool's purpose is inherently distinct by default in this minimal set.
The single tool name 'process_note_request' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and since there are no other tools, consistency is trivially perfect with no deviations to assess.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'NotesY', which suggests a domain involving notes management. This minimal count likely leaves significant gaps in functionality, such as creating, retrieving, updating, or deleting notes, making it inappropriate for the implied scope.
The server appears to target note management, but with only one generic tool ('process_note_request') and no description, the surface is severely incomplete. It lacks basic CRUD operations and any clear lifecycle coverage, making it inadequate for the domain.