Delete Alarm

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With destructiveHint=true already in annotations, the description adds value by emphasizing 'Permanently delete', highlighting irreversibility. It also implies that an ID must be obtained from list_alarms, which is useful behavioral context. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences, front-loaded with the action, and includes a helpful cross-reference to list_alarms. Every word earns its place; there is no padding or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter destructive tool with no output schema, the description is sufficiently complete: it clarifies the irreversible nature, tells how to obtain the required ID, and is appropriately concise. No gaps remain for typical usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 100% of the single parameter (id) with a description 'Alarm ID'. The tool description doesn't add any further parameter semantics beyond referring to the ID, so it adds no value beyond the schema baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Permanently delete' and a clear resource 'an alarm', making the tool's function unambiguous. It also distinguishes this tool from siblings like list_alarms and set_alarm by implying removal versus creation or listing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells the agent to use list_alarms to find the alarm ID, indicating a key prerequisite. However, it doesn't explicitly state when not to use this tool or mention alternatives beyond list_alarms, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.