warp-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to warp-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Saperly that enables AI agents to provision phone numbers, place calls, send SMS, and manage credentials via 36 tools backed by the Saperly API.26 npm3MIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for BubblyPhone that lets AI assistants make real phone calls, manage AI voice agents, buy phone numbers in 30+ countries, and track billing. Supports 20 tools for full telephony control.202 npm1MIT

oitvoip-mcp-serverofficial
FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI agents with seamless access to the NetSapiens VoIP platform for user management, call analytics, and system administration.234-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for provisioning dedicated real-SIM US phone numbers, receiving inbound SMS, and extracting OTP codes. Built for AI agents automating phone verification workflows.25 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents hands to make phone calls, send messages, and handle CRM/task workflows. It runs with a simulated provider for zero-cost testing and can switch to real providers like Twilio and ElevenLabs.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants inspect and control Asterisk and FreeSWITCH PBX systems, enabling natural language queries about live switch status, channels, registrations, and call control.1048 npm17MIT
TDQS
Scored across 135 tools
Tools are grouped by domain prefixes (acct_, net_, key_, bill_, msg_, num_, port_, trunk_, team_, cdr_) and nearly every tool has a distinct resource+action purpose. A few near-duplicates exist (acct_get_balance vs bill_get_balance, key_get_audit vs key_get_audit_all, msg_list vs msg_get_stats), but their descriptions explicitly disambiguate them, so an agent should rarely misselect.
All 135 tools follow a consistent snake_case domain_prefix_verb_noun pattern (e.g. trunk_list_endpoints, msg_create_campaign, port_get_progress). The naming is highly predictable across the entire tool surface, with no mixed conventions or vague verbs.
135 tools is far beyond the range that can be considered well-scoped for an LLM agent's tool set. Even though the server covers many domains, this extreme count creates a large selection surface, memory burden, and prompt overhead that outweighs the depth of coverage.
The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive: accounts, networking, API keys, billing, SMS/10DLC messaging, number inventory, port-in lifecycle, trunk management, team/roles, and CDR analytics all have robust CRUD/lifecycle coverage. The port-in workflow in particular has no obvious dead ends—create through activate, including documents, validation, auto-fix, resubmission, and cancellation.