A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceEnables non-vision LLMs to analyze images via any OpenAI-compatible vision API. Hardened against truncation, empty responses, and timeouts for reliable analysis.
1
23 npm
MIT
mcp-six-eyes
by RimunAce
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-six-eyes
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA drop-in MCP vision server for Zhipu GLM Coding Plan, offering 8 vision tools powered by glm-5v-turbo with smart retry and caching.818 npm1MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that adds vision capabilities to text-only AI models by sending images (local files, URLs, clipboard, screenshots) to a vision model and returning text descriptions.1208 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that provides vision understanding to non-multimodal agents via 4 tools (analyze/describe/OCR image, list providers), supporting 13 vision providers with automatic fallback and secure URL handling.4281 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides visual question answering, image description, object detection, OCR, and image manipulation tools using OpenAI-compatible vision models.12166 npmGPL 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that analyzes images with Google's Gemini vision models, allowing agents to describe or ask questions about images without bloating context.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA versatile MCP server that adds vision capabilities (image analysis, OCR, image/video generation) to AI models lacking native vision, with support for multiple providers and automatic task routing.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for analyzing images using multiple vision LLM providers (OpenCode, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and custom OpenAI-compatible endpoints). Provides tools to analyze single or multiple images, list providers, and test vision capabilities.MIT
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: general Q&A, description, OCR, comparison, UI inspection, chart reading, diagram explanation, and structured extraction. Some overlap exists between analyze_image, describe_image, and refer_images, but their descriptions clarify the intended use cases, so agent confusion is unlikely.
Naming Consistency4/5
The naming convention is largely verb_noun (analyze_image, compare_images, inspect_ui, read_chart, explain_diagram, extract_from_images). Minor deviations include vision_status (noun_noun) and ocr_image (acronym as verb), but the pattern is readable and predictable overall.
Tool Count5/5
With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped for an image analysis domain. Each tool addresses a distinct need, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range for a focused MCP server.
Completeness5/5
The tool surface covers general image Q&A, detailed description, OCR, comparison, labeled references, UI inspection, chart reading, diagram explanation, and structured data extraction—no obvious dead ends or missing essential operations for an image understanding server.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues