order_api

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'execute new order' without mentioning authentication needs, rate limits, side effects (e.g., order placed on exchange), or error handling. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but overly terse for a tool with 9 parameters. It establishes purpose but lacks structure and additional details that would fit in a brief description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high parameter count and sibling tools, the description is incomplete. It does not explain order types, parameter relationships, or return value behavior. Although an output schema exists, its presence is not mentioned.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 33% (only side, symbol, execution_type have descriptions). The tool description adds no parameter information, so it fails to compensate for the low coverage. Many parameters like size, stop_price, limit_price remain undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies 'new order for GMO Coin FX' with the verb 'execute', clearly indicating the tool places a new order. This distinguishes it from siblings like cancel_orders_api or change_order_api.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as ifd_order_api or ifdoco_order_api. The description lacks any context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.