Skip to main content
Glama

mesh_delegate

Create, list, or revoke call-only delegate keys for sub-agents, limiting allowed capabilities and daily MESH spend.

Instructions

Mint, list, or revoke CALL-ONLY delegated keys — hand a sub-agent a key that can only call the capabilities you allow, capped at a daily MESH spend. Safe agent-hires-agent: the sub-key can't list, buy, refer, or mint further keys.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNodelegate id (for revoke)
allowNocapability slugs this key may call (omit = all)
labelNowhat this key is for, e.g. 'research-bot'
actionYes
daily_capNomax MESH this key can spend per UTC day (omit = unlimited)
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description partially compensates by stating the key restrictions (call-only, capped spend, no further minting) but does not detail behaviors like side effects or permissions needed for each action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences front-load the purpose and key restrictions, with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the tool's purpose and restrictions but lacks details on return values, error handling, or prerequisites, which would be helpful given no output schema and multiple parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 80% and descriptions in schema are adequate. The tool description adds context about allowed capabilities and daily cap but duplicates schema information without significant new meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool manages CALL-ONLY delegated keys with specific actions (mint/list/revoke) and distinguishes it from sibling tools by noting the sub-key cannot list, buy, refer, or mint further keys.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for delegating sub-agent keys with restrictions but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives among the many sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RightOnPar-LLC/mesh-connector'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server