Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
XRPL Token Guard

XRPL Token Guard

by Riehnbean
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to XRPL Token Guard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • web3-risk-mcp

      MelvTheGoat
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to assess the risk of crypto wallets, tokens, and smart contracts by providing read-only on-chain analysis, 0-100 risk scoring with explanations, fund tracing, and contract inspection before interaction.
      6
      MIT

    • devx-address-poisoning-check

      devx-agent
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users and AI agents to verify whether a crypto recipient address is an address-poisoning lookalike or has an invalid EIP-55 checksum before sending funds, and provides access to an on-chain history scan for suspicious transfers.
      2
      MIT

    • bewary

      bewary-app
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and apps to check URLs, domains, IP addresses, phone numbers, emails, crypto wallets, IBANs, mobile apps, and payment handles for scam, phishing, and fraud risk, returning verdicts, probabilities, facts, and reason codes.
      MIT
    • pnllabs-mcp

      pnllabs-mcpofficial

      PnLlabs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives AI trading agents machine-readable trust and risk verdicts on Solana by checking whether a wallet's realized PnL makes it worth copying, where its funds came from, whether a token is structurally safe, and what a given trade size would really cost in slippage. Exposes these four checks as MCP tools callable against a hosted x402 pay-per-call API, so agents can hard-stop bad trades without RPC keys, signup, or local setup.
      1
      MIT

    • rugradar

      Darkjay123
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to check whether a crypto token, link, or forwarded "gem" message is a scam by running contract rules, live test trades, creator history, and market data across 64 networks, returning plain-English or Pidgin verdicts. Also supports scanning messages, reviewing a token's past checks, and explaining individual findings.
      5
      MIT
    • verdix

      verdixofficial

      verdixapi
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check an EVM address on Base for risk (safe, caution, danger) before sending funds, with reasons, paid per call via x402 from the user's own wallet.
      7
      309 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools target distinct objects: issued tokens, official token identity, and wallet signing authority. There is some overlap between check_token_safety and is_it_the_real_token regarding fake tokens, but the descriptions make the boundary clear: one is an instant official-issuer lookup, the other is a live ledger risk assessment.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Two tools follow a consistent check_* pattern (check_token_safety, check_wallet_security), but is_it_the_real_token breaks the verb_noun convention and is phrased as a question. The set is still readable, but the naming convention is mixed.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is a narrow but defensible surface for a focused safety-checking server; each tool covers a distinct safety question. It is on the thin side, but not trivially so.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflows are covered: token risk screening, official issuer verification, and wallet signer checks. Minor gaps remain, such as checking trustlines/balances or broader issuer history, but agents can work around these for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessLimited data

    Resources