Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-fsolar

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for EG4 solar inverters, enabling real-time monitoring, performance analysis, battery health, alerts, maintenance insights, and historical data via natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Solplanet ASW5-T inverter, enabling natural language queries about solar energy system status and control.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A powerful MCP server that enables AI assistants like Claude to access, analyze, and optimize solar energy data from FoxESS inverters.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server integrating with the Victron VRM API to monitor solar systems, batteries, alarms, and more.
      41
      9 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables natural language interaction with the MeteoControl VCOM API v2 for monitoring solar array installations. It allows users to retrieve real-time and historical energy data, system alerts, and detailed asset configuration metrics.
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Victron Venus OS that enables reading battery, PV, grid, and inverter data via D-Bus and MQTT, and safely controlling inverter mode and charge limits.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct scopes: fleet vs battery vs cell-level, raw vs statistics, health vs history. However, get_health, get_module_health, get_cell_stats, get_cell_voltages, and get_balance_trend all touch on cell/module health and could be confusing without careful reading, though descriptions clarify granularity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent get_ + noun pattern, using snake_case for compound names. There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs, making the naming predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 17 tools, the server sits in the 16–25 range, feeling somewhat heavy for a monitoring API. While each tool serves a specific data need, the count could be trimmed by merging closely related health/cell tools without losing functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only monitoring surface is fairly complete: live status, health, alerts, energy history, capacity estimates, power stats, cost savings, and lifetime data are all covered. Minor gaps include lack of a dedicated temperature history or per-module raw voltage detail, but these are workarounds via snapshots.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues