mcp-fsolar
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-fsolar
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for EG4 solar inverters, enabling real-time monitoring, performance analysis, battery health, alerts, maintenance insights, and historical data via natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Solplanet ASW5-T inverter, enabling natural language queries about solar energy system status and control.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA powerful MCP server that enables AI assistants like Claude to access, analyze, and optimize solar energy data from FoxESS inverters.3MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceRead-only MCP server integrating with the Victron VRM API to monitor solar systems, batteries, alarms, and more.419 npm6MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables natural language interaction with the MeteoControl VCOM API v2 for monitoring solar array installations. It allows users to retrieve real-time and historical energy data, system alerts, and detailed asset configuration metrics.4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Victron Venus OS that enables reading battery, PV, grid, and inverter data via D-Bus and MQTT, and safely controlling inverter mode and charge limits.11MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools target distinct scopes: fleet vs battery vs cell-level, raw vs statistics, health vs history. However, get_health, get_module_health, get_cell_stats, get_cell_voltages, and get_balance_trend all touch on cell/module health and could be confusing without careful reading, though descriptions clarify granularity.
All tool names follow a consistent get_ + noun pattern, using snake_case for compound names. There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs, making the naming predictable and uniform.
With 17 tools, the server sits in the 16–25 range, feeling somewhat heavy for a monitoring API. While each tool serves a specific data need, the count could be trimmed by merging closely related health/cell tools without losing functionality.
The read-only monitoring surface is fairly complete: live status, health, alerts, energy history, capacity estimates, power stats, cost savings, and lifetime data are all covered. Minor gaps include lack of a dedicated temperature history or per-module raw voltage detail, but these are workarounds via snapshots.