No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 20 tools
Most tools are clearly separated by resource and action (plan, memory, git, skills, GLM runs). The only mild ambiguity is among glm_status, glm_result, and glm_wait, but their descriptions make the distinction reasonably explicit.
The snake_case verb_noun pattern is dominant and recognizable across all tool groups. Minor deviations like glm_models (noun-only) and the skills_list vs skill_read singular/plural mismatch prevent a perfect score.
Twenty tools is on the heavy side for a single server, even though the grouping into GLM lifecycle, memory, plan, git, and skills makes the set navigable. It falls into the 16–25 range where the tool count starts to feel like a burden rather than a curated surface.
Core workflows are well covered: GLM runs have create/status/result/cancel/wait/list/apply, memory has full lifecycle, skills are readable, and plan/git basics exist. Minor gaps include no plan editing/removal and no git diff/log, but these are workable or intentionally left to the user.