Skip to main content
Glama
RhombusSystems

Rhombus MCP Server

Official

create-camera-policy-tool

Create a camera policy by defining its name, description, and organization, then configuring schedules and assigning cameras in a guided multi-step process.

Instructions

A tool for creating a camera policy that walks users through a multi-step process.

The step begins with the user providing a policy name, description, and organization UUID. Then, the user is presented with a form to configure the schedules for the policy. Finally, the user is presented with a form to assign the policy to cameras.

Uses elicitation forms for rich user interaction.

Output filtering (all tools):

  • includeFields (string[]): Dot-notation paths to keep in the response (e.g. "vehicleEvents.vehicleLicensePlate"). Omit to return all fields.

  • filterBy (array): Predicates to filter array items. Each entry: {field, op, value} where op is one of = != > >= < <= contains. All conditions are ANDed. Example: [{field:"vehicleLicensePlate", op:"=", value:"ABC123"}] WARNING: some tool responses exceed 400k characters — use these params to request only the data you need.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesPolicy name (for creating policy)
descriptionYesPolicy description (for creating policy)
orgUuidYesOrganization UUID (for creating policy)
policyUuidYesPolicy UUID (for configuring schedules)
scheduleConfigsYesJSON string of schedule configurations
cameraUuidsYesComma-separated camera UUIDs to assign policy to
policyNameYesPolicy name (for reference)
includeFieldsYesDot-notation field paths to include in the response (e.g. "vehicleEvents.vehicleLicensePlate"). Pass null to return all fields. WARNING: some responses can exceed 400k characters — use includeFields to request only the data you need. For high-volume tools this may be required to get a complete answer.
filterByYesFilter array items in the response by field values. All conditions are ANDed. Example: [{field: "vehicleLicensePlate", op: "=", value: "ABC123"}, {field: "confidence", op: ">", value: 0.8}] Use alongside includeFields to get only the specific records and fields you need.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
needUserInputNo
messageNoThe message for this stage in the policy creation process. This message will be displayed to the user.
requestTypeNoThe type of form to display to the user as the next step in the policy creation process
submitActionNoThe action to take when the user completes the form, corresponds to the tool name to interact with next
policyUuidNoThe UUID of the policy that was created during this workflow
policyNameNoThe name of the policy that was created during this workflow
scheduleDataNoThe schedules that were created during this workflow, can be null or undefined if user has not created them yet with schedule-trigger-configuration
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It mentions the multi-step process and 'uses elicitation forms for rich user interaction,' hinting at interactive behavior. However, it does not disclose side effects (e.g., persistent resource creation), required permissions, or error states. The generic output filtering warnings are not behavioral.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is verbose, with a large block of generic output filtering instructions that are not specific to this tool. The core purpose and steps are stated concisely, but the boilerplate text should be removed or placed elsewhere. This hurts readability and conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (9 required parameters, multi-step process, output schema exists), the description covers the workflow adequately but does not explain the return value, success indications, or error conditions. The output filtering section adds noise rather than completeness. The description is sufficient but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the input schema already describes all 9 parameters. The description adds some context by explaining the steps (e.g., first three parameters for creation, then scheduleConfigs, then cameraUuids). However, it does not add significant semantics beyond what the schema descriptions already provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: creating a camera policy via a multi-step process. It distinguishes from siblings like policy-alerts-tool by focusing on policy creation. However, the generic output filtering section slightly clutters the purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description outlines the three steps (create, configure schedules, assign cameras), which helps the agent understand the workflow. However, it lacks explicit instructions on when to use this tool over alternatives or when not to use it. No sibling tool directly competes, so the guidance is adequate but not exemplary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RhombusSystems/rhombus-node-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server