Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ox-mcp

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Local MCP server for macOS Mail reads plus visible unsent compose, reply, and forward drafts, and constrained single-message moves.
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A comprehensive MCP server that aggregates email, calendar, and contacts across Google, Microsoft, Zoho, and IMAP/SMTP services, designed for headless environments with OAuth device flow support.
    13
    52 npm
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server that enables email management (send, read, search, delete, etc.) via IMAP/SMTP, compatible with Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, iCloud, and other standard mail servers.
    11
    29 PyPI
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for reading and sending emails via IMAP and SMTP, designed for Zimbra and any standard mail host.
    4 npm
    1
    ISC
  • -
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Secure MCP server for Microsoft Exchange. It enables authorized users to list, search, read, download attachments, send, and reply to email via EWS with strict access control and audit.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to work with a Microsoft Exchange mailbox over EWS, covering mail reading, searching and filing, calendar viewing and editing, free/busy checks, meeting-room discovery and booking, and sending mail with attachments, signatures and delayed delivery. Includes dry-run previews, recoverable deletes, attachment sandboxing, and read-only or no-send modes.
    MIT

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 33 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Tools are cleanly partitioned into email_*, calendar_*, and contact_* groups with distinct actions. A few email tools overlap slightly in effect (email_move vs email_archive vs email_mark_spam all relocate a message, and email_flag vs email_mark_read both set flags), but the descriptions clarify the boundaries well.

Naming Consistency4/5

A consistent domain_verb_noun convention (email_create_folder, calendar_create_event, contact_create) dominates, with implied-noun variants (email_send, email_reply, email_delete) that stay readable. Minor deviation is the sub-resource prefix pattern in email_filter_list/email_filter_create/email_filter_update and email_list_folders, but overall predictable.

Tool Count4/5

33 tools is on the heavy side, but the server genuinely spans three substantial domains (mail, calendar, contacts), and nearly every tool maps to a real operation. Slightly above the ideal range for a single MCP server but justified by scope.

Completeness4/5

Email coverage is strong (list/read/send/reply/draft/search/folders/flags/filters), and calendar covers the full event lifecycle including invitations. Minor gaps remain: no email_filter_delete, and contacts lack update/delete operations, but core workflows are covered.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive