Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
flarum-mcp

flarum-mcp

by ReverserID
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Create a discussion

create_discussion

Start a new Flarum discussion with title, Markdown content, and required tag IDs. At least one primary tag is needed.

Instructions

Start a new discussion (requires REVERSER_API_TOKEN). Flarum needs at least one primary tag — pass tag ids from list_tags. Content is Markdown.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "title": "<title>",
      "content": "<content>",
      "tagIds": "<tagIds>"
    },
    "name": "create_discussion"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYesDiscussion title
tagIdsYesTag ids — at least one primary category (see list_tags)
contentYesBody, in Markdown

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.1

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must cover behavior. It mentions authentication and Markdown format, but lacks details on return values, error handling, or side effects beyond creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences with no redundancy. Could be slightly more structured but is efficient and front-loaded with the main action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple creation tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, the description covers prerequisites and key constraints. Missing some behavioral context but adequate given low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description adds minimal extra value (e.g., Markdown hint). The baseline is 3, and the description does not significantly enhance understanding beyond schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Start a new discussion' clearly states the verb 'create' and the resource 'discussion', distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_discussion, reply_to_discussion, and search_discussions that perform different actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Specifies a prerequisite (REVERSER_API_TOKEN) and provides guidance on how to get tag ids (list_tags). However, it does not explicitly state when to use alternatives or exclude cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools