A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceAn MCP server for accessing Turkish legislation (laws, regulations, decrees) via the Adalet Bakanligi API, providing search, full-text retrieval, and structured citations.
5
Apache 2.0
rcw-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to rcw-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Federal Register of Legislation, enabling point-in-time searches, retrieval, and verification of Australian Commonwealth law, including citation checking.847 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for U.S. federal law that enables searching the U.S. Code, CFR, Federal Register, case law, and bills, with citation verification against primary sources to prevent hallucinations.11MIT
Vaquill-AI/vaquill-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Vaquill legal research API. Covers US federal + 50-state law (USC, CFR, state legislation, CourtListener case law)257MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Australia's Federal Register of Legislation. Enables searching and fetching Commonwealth Acts with verifiable citations.3Apache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that wraps the NY Senate OpenLegislation API to look up and search the New York Criminal Procedure Law by citation or keyword.2-
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_section retrieves full text, search finds citations by partial citation string, and cite_affected lists bills affecting a citation. There is no overlap between these functions, and the descriptions explicitly warn about search's limitation to citations, reducing ambiguity.
Naming Consistency2/5
The naming conventions are inconsistent: 'get_section' follows a verb_noun pattern, 'search' is a bare verb, and 'cite_affected' uses an awkward compound that doesn't clearly convey its purpose. This mixed style makes the tool set feel less predictable and cohesive.
Tool Count4/5
With only 3 tools, the server is on the thin side, but for a niche domain like RCW legal references, this count is reasonable. The tools cover the core workflows of finding a section, retrieving its text, and checking related bills, so the count feels appropriate for the scope.
Completeness3/5
The set provides essential retrieval and citation lookup, but notable gaps exist: there is no keyword search, no browsing of titles or chapters, and legislative history is limited to bills affecting a specific citation. While the description notes an API constraint, the surface is still somewhat incomplete for broad legal research.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues