Skip to main content
Glama
RetireGolden

RetireGolden MCP

Official
by RetireGolden

Related Servers

Alternatives to RetireGolden MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for cove-fi, a deterministic retirement and financial-independence projection engine. It lets users run plans, create scenarios, and explore year-by-year net-worth projections through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for ProjectionLab — export, snapshot, and restore your financial plans. Includes a built-in FIRE advisor knowledge base.
      5
      5 npm
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing UK financial adviser calculations (tax, IHT, pensions, portfolios) to any MCP-capable client.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A thin MCP bridge that connects any MCP client to the Numeratica financial-planning API — retirement Monte Carlo, taxes, RMDs, Social Security, Roth conversions, and more.
      39 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A simulation engine for retirement planning, accessible via an MCP server that allows AI agents to create financial plans, manage income, expenses, loans, taxes, and portfolios, and run Monte Carlo simulations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Official MCP server for Agni Folio, a free multi-currency wealth & portfolio tracker. 23 tools for holdings, performance, FIRE planning, crypto P&L, and confirm-gated writes — hosted endpoint with OAuth 2.1, plus a Docker stdio bridge in this repo.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: building, projecting, comparing, validating, explaining, solving for spending, batch evaluating, and schema description. No two tools have overlapping purposes; an agent can clearly distinguish them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., build_plan, compare_scenarios), but batch_evaluate is a verb_verb form, making it slightly inconsistent. Overall, naming is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a retirement planning server. Each tool serves a core function without unnecessary redundancy, covering the essential workflows.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers key lifecycle operations: build, project, validate, compare, and solve. However, missing explicit tools to update or retrieve the current plan represent minor gaps that could complicate workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues