Skip to main content
Glama
Retio-ai

PageMap

Official
by Retio-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to PageMap

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents a compact, semantic interface to the browser, returning structured page snapshots with stable element IDs instead of raw DOM. Enables agents to navigate, interact, and extract information from web pages efficiently.
      26
      20 npm
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to parse web pages into decision-ready state—dates as dates, numbers with units, and text chunks sized for a model's window—reducing token usage and providing traceable anchors.
      2
      65 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to navigate and interact with web pages through compressed semantic graphs, using element IDs and coordinates for clicking, typing, selecting, scrolling, and screenshots without raw HTML or CSS selectors.
      41 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to understand web page structure and content through structured data extraction and element discovery using Playwright, eliminating the need for screenshots.
      4
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to extract clean, structured web content (articles, tables, links, visual layouts) optimized for LLM token efficiency, with fast response times and optional JavaScript support.
      5
      144 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A client-server browser automation solution that reduces HTML token usage by up to 90% through semantic snapshots, enabling complex web interactions without exhausting AI context windows.
      28
      25 npm
      15
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinctly different purpose: page state vs full map, screenshot, navigation (back, scroll), form filling vs single action, waiting, tab lifecycle, and batch map retrieval. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause an agent to select the wrong tool for a given operation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case with action-first verbs (get_, take_, navigate_, scroll_, fill_, wait_, execute_, open_, switch_, list_, close_, batch_get_). The pattern is mostly verb_noun, with minor deviations like 'navigate_back' and 'wait_for' that are still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a web automation server. Each tool is justified and non-redundant, covering page inspection, interaction, navigation, waiting, screenshot, tab management, and batch processing without excessive granularity.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core browsing lifecycle: get page data, interact, fill forms, wait, navigate back, scroll, take screenshots, manage tabs, and batch fetch. Minor gaps include lack of an explicit forward navigation or refresh, and navigation to a URL is implicitly done via get_page_map(url), but these are workable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues