get_member
Retrieve a Discord server member's information and roles by specifying the guild and user IDs.
Instructions
Inspect a server member and their roles.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | ||
| guild_id | Yes |
Retrieve a Discord server member's information and roles by specifying the guild and user IDs.
Inspect a server member and their roles.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | ||
| guild_id | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate read-only behavior, but the description does not specify the exact output format or whether the response includes the full member object, roles, or both.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description leaves significant ambiguity about the response structure, which is critical for an AI agent to use the tool correctly, especially given no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Parameter names and patterns are given in the schema, but the description adds no extra clarification about their roles (e.g., that user_id is the member's ID within the guild).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (inspect) and the resource (a server member and their roles), distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_members or get_user.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use when needing member details, but does not explicitly contrast with related tools or mention when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RestartFU/discord-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server