Skip to main content
Glama
Renwang-Huang

TypeSafe MCP

by Renwang-Huang
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to TypeSafe MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jev-mcp

      henrykey
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes bounded TypeSafe Jev/System One decision primitives as MCP tools, enabling agents to make choices, scores, yes/no judgments, and batched decisions over remote HTTPS with shared state.
      MIT

    • use-jev

      silkyland
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable agents to run TypeSafe's Jev judgment model as typed yes/no, choice, and score tools, with calibrated probabilities, confidence thresholds, escalation for uncertain or non-judgment tasks, and an optional action gate that fails open.
      1
      MIT

    • daf-jev

      docxology
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language interaction with TypeSafe's Jev decision API, supporting mixed question calls, batch evaluation, model listing, and confidence or composite-score gates over stdio.
      6
      MIT

    • McpHub

      John0King
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI tools to uniformly discover, inspect, and call tools, prompts, and resources from multiple upstream MCP servers through a small set of fixed MCP tools, over stdio or HTTP.
      2
      MIT

    • jev-mcp

      rajasekharponakala
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to obtain typed judgments from TypeSafe's Jev System One models, including yes/no probabilities, multiple-choice selections with distributions, and rubric-based scores, directly usable in code.
      5
      2
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, reinforced by explicit DO NOT USE cross-references that map boundary cases to the correct tool. Even the broadest tool, evaluate, is positioned as the raw-answer fallback rather than a competitor to the specialized distribution, threshold, or routing tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tools all follow a consistent lowercase single-word imperative style, which is easy to predict and read. The only minor deviation is health, which is a noun rather than a verb, so the pattern is not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is a well-scoped count for a typed evaluation and decision primitive library. Each tool represents a distinct decision mode, and none feel redundant, superficial, or missing.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers raw typed evaluation, classification, scoring, whole-object review, single and multi-claim verification, threshold gating, routing, and health checks. For the apparent purpose of safe, typed decision primitives, there are no significant gaps or dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources