Skip to main content
Glama
Reid-n0rc

Future Electronics MCP

by Reid-n0rc
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Future Electronics MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • DigiKey MCP Server

      Anbus2011
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving product information from DigiKey's API, including part lookup, keyword search, product details, and pricing.
      -

    • ingrammicro-mcp

      MSPbotsAI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables the full Ingram Micro Reseller purchasing lifecycle through a single stateless HTTP MCP service, covering catalog and pricing, quotes, quote-to-order, order placement/modification/cancellation/lookup, invoices, renewals, special deals, returns, and freight estimates with one set of credentials.
      24
      Apache 2.0

    • Parts Finder MCP

      controlguy-ys
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for finding, comparing, and shortlisting engineering parts from distributor and marketplace APIs.
      6
      MIT

    • inventory-mcp

      ruanderson1
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for querying product inventory, providing tools to retrieve product details and stock quantities.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: future_lookup_part for a single part with full offer details, and future_lookup_parts for bulk/BOM lookups. The descriptions explicitly guide the agent to use the correct tool for each scenario, eliminating ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with the 'future_lookup_' prefix. This is predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools cover the core lookup operations (single and bulk) well, which is appropriate for a focused catalog lookup service. However, the count is on the lower side compared to typical servers, making it slightly thin.

    Completeness5/5

    The server provides complete coverage for its apparent domain of electronic component lookup: single-part detailed lookup and bulk BOM processing with exception handling, totals, and pricing. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources