A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI agents to plan trips by searching flights, accommodations, and activities, and managing itineraries collaboratively with role-based permissions.
20
4 npm
104 PyPI
1
MIT
Travel Planning MCP
by Reese-max
Related Servers
Alternatives to Travel Planning MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables LLMs to perform travel-related tasks by interacting with Google Maps and travel planning services including location search, place details, and travel time calculations.520 npm99MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to plan trips in MyNextAdventure by creating trips, managing itineraries, adding flights, hotels, and activities, and sharing results through the MCP protocol.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables travel planning through natural language, providing weather forecasts, attraction search, itinerary generation, and distance calculations using free APIs.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables multi-agent travel planning by orchestrating specialized agents for transport, accommodation, and experiences, using live web search and structured data extraction to generate complete trip plans.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing travel itineraries with CRUD tools for journeys, stops, and plan items, plus weather lookup, integrated with public MCP servers for time and web search.-
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 15 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools cleanly map to distinct resources or actions, and the get_* read tools are generally easy to separate. get_trip_context intentionally overlaps with get_trip/get_place/get_reservation/get_constraints as an aggregate view, but its description clarifies that distinction.
Naming Consistency5/5
Tool names consistently follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_, list_, search_, calculate_, validate_, create_, apply_, rollback_. The change-proposal family is especially predictable because every stage uses the same verb-first structure.
Tool Count5/5
At 15 tools, the set sits comfortably within the ideal range and each tool earns its place: reads, search, route calculation, proposal lifecycle, audit, and admin rollback are all represented. There is no obvious bloat or redundancy.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers trip/place/reservation/constraint reads plus a full validate-create-apply proposal workflow, audit trail, and rollback capability. Minor gaps exist around listing, updating, or deleting change proposals, but the core planning workflow is well supported and the mutation restrictions appear intentional.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues