Skip to main content
Glama
RealMikeChong

Ultra MCP

by RealMikeChong
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Ultra MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP AI Bridge

      fakoli
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude Code to connect with OpenAI and Google Gemini models, allowing users to query multiple AI providers through a standardized interface.
      3
      3
      MIT

    • PAL MCP

      ramarivera
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that connects multiple AI models into a single workflow, enabling multi-model orchestration, conversation continuity, and tools like code review, planning, and CLI-to-CLI bridging.
      -

    • Zen MCP Enhanced

      199-mcp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An enhanced Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude to seamlessly collaborate with multiple AI models (Gemini, OpenAI, local models) for code analysis and development tasks, maintaining context across conversations.
      8 npm
      54
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have overlapping purposes, causing significant ambiguity. For example, 'analyze-code' and 'ultra-analyze' both handle code analysis, while 'debug-issue' and 'ultra-debug' both address debugging. The 'ultra-' prefixed tools often duplicate core functions without clear distinctions, making it difficult for an agent to choose between them.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming conventions are inconsistent, mixing hyphenated names (e.g., 'analyze-code') with 'ultra-' prefixed versions (e.g., 'ultra-analyze') and some standalone terms (e.g., 'planner', 'tracer'). There is no uniform verb_noun pattern, and the duplication between core and 'ultra-' tools adds to the confusion rather than following a predictable structure.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 27 tools, the count is excessive for a coherent set, as many tools overlap in functionality (e.g., multiple analysis, debugging, and planning tools). This bloat suggests poor scoping, where the server tries to cover too many similar tasks with redundant tools, making it heavy and inefficient for agents to navigate.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers a broad range of development and AI-related tasks, such as code analysis, debugging, planning, and research, with no obvious major gaps in core workflows. However, the redundancy and lack of clear domain boundaries make it hard to assess true completeness, as overlapping tools might obscure missing operations rather than providing comprehensive coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources