Skip to main content
Glama
RealAlexandreAI

mcp-interactive

by RealAlexandreAI
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-interactive

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • gl-mcp-feedback

      youjunxiaji
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A feedback-oriented MCP server with a Web UI for AI development workflows, enabling interactive confirmations and reducing speculative tool calls.
      2
      3
      MIT

    • Interactive Feedback MCP

      ISimon3
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables human-in-the-loop workflow in AI-assisted development tools by allowing users to provide direct feedback to AI agents without consuming additional premium requests.
      1
      1
      -

    • mcp-feedback-enhanced

      EarthChen
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with dual Web UI and desktop application interfaces, enabling AI to confirm with users via prompts and real-time feedback to reduce speculative operations and improve efficiency.
      2
      MIT

    • Copilot Leecher

      xiangxiaobo
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables users to review and refine AI outputs through a local web UI, returning feedback as free tool call results to save on GitHub Copilot premium requests. It allows for multiple rounds of iterative improvements within a single request session.
      1
      30
      -

    • gl-mcp-feedback

      teacat99
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      提供交互式反馈MCP服务器，通过Web UI实现AI与用户的确认流程，提高开发效率并节省平台成本。
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool for interactive feedback is borderline; it serves a narrow purpose but might feel thin for broader interactive workflows.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the core need for iterative feedback collection, though it lacks structured options for feedback types or granular control.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources