get_iulaan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full responsibility. It indicates a read operation but gives no details about return format, authentication, rate limits, error handling, or what 'attachment links' entails beyond the phrase.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with no redundancy, front-loading the verb and resource. It is concise and to the point, earning its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-parameter read tool, the description captures the core function, but it omits usage context, parameter semantics, and output details. It is minimally viable but lacks depth for a fully self-sufficient description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage. The description does not explain the 'url_or_id' parameter beyond its self-explanatory name, nor does it provide format, examples, or whether it accepts URL or ID. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool reads one Iulaan posting and its attachment links, using a specific verb ('Read') and resource ('Iulaan posting'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like search_iulaan (search) and read_iulaan_attachment (individual attachments), as it explicitly covers the posting plus attachment links.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as search_iulaan or read_iulaan_attachment. The description lacks prerequisites, context, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.